Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Read my Latest Blog Entries at the Wordpress Blog
My apologies for abandoning my blogger.com blog - I have found that I have more readers on my wordpress duplicate blog and find wordpress to be more user friendly. I apologize for any inconvenience. Please refer to my wordpress blog (mylawschooldreams.wordpress.com) for the most up-to-date entries.
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Itunes U Podcast on State and Federal Courts
Emory University has a series of podcasts on Itunes U entitled "Mini Law School," which I have been thoroughly enjoying. Each podcast topic ranges from first amendment and religion rights, torts, constitutional law, and my favorite: State and Federal Courts. All of the podcasts are FREE and are a great intro to law school (though I found them useful as an undergraduate). Click the subject title of this blog post to be directed to the Emory University State and Federal Court podcast.
Sandra Day O'Connor on the Daily Show
Often we come to know the justices of the United States Supreme Court after they have stepped down from the bench. My undergraduate poli sci professor who taught a class on SCOTUS lectured about the many reasons justices attempt to remain very private, so as not to reveal any insight into how they may rule on a particular issue. I recently came across an older clip from 2009 when Sandra Day O'Connor was on the Daily Show and I think it exhibits Justice O'Connor's personality as a person, rather than as a justice for the United States Supreme Court. (To view the clip, click on the title of this blog post).
Since Sandra Day O'Connor's retirement she has been busy working on educational websites and tools for middle-school aged children to better understand the judiciary; her website ourcourts.org is actually very entertaining, there is an interactive (and addicting) online game where the student (read: me) can play an attorney, and clients enter the law firm explaining their issues and its up to the "lawyer" to determine whether the client's constitutional rights have been infringed upon.
Additionally, former justice O'Connor has been busily speaking in support of merit selection of judges not just at the federal level, but at the state level from the supreme appellate courts down to the trial courts. I agree with this position and am in fact working on an extensive research paper on judicial selection and working with a local county judge. I plan to submit my paper to my undergraduate's research journal in hopes of having it published. . . . all the while studying for the June LSAT which I registered for two days ago.
Since Sandra Day O'Connor's retirement she has been busy working on educational websites and tools for middle-school aged children to better understand the judiciary; her website ourcourts.org is actually very entertaining, there is an interactive (and addicting) online game where the student (read: me) can play an attorney, and clients enter the law firm explaining their issues and its up to the "lawyer" to determine whether the client's constitutional rights have been infringed upon.
Additionally, former justice O'Connor has been busily speaking in support of merit selection of judges not just at the federal level, but at the state level from the supreme appellate courts down to the trial courts. I agree with this position and am in fact working on an extensive research paper on judicial selection and working with a local county judge. I plan to submit my paper to my undergraduate's research journal in hopes of having it published. . . . all the while studying for the June LSAT which I registered for two days ago.
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Countdown to the June, 2010 LSAT
Its on! I have decided that the June 7, 2010 LSAT is the right time for me to take this dreadful test. Thus, I thought it would be appropriate to start the countdown now! I have already begun the Powerscore Logic Game Bibles and will try to keep my blog updated with my progress. Fortunately, my initial diagnostic was so "sad" that I can only go up! (I hope).
Friday, December 11, 2009
Gen Y and Professional Appearances (For the Ladies)
When I think of professional attire – my mind automatically directs itself to images of the “Hilary” pantsuit or a “Jackie O” inspired skirt suit. Both of which are beyond my years and I would look ridiculous sporting either looks. Often, when I go suit shopping I feel like a little girl playing dress-up with her mother’s work clothing.
So I beg the question: how does a 20’s something professional look respectable, business-like without looking boring or “dress-up” like?
The first mistake a lot of freshy lawyers make is investing in a suit that is too trendy. If you’re going to shell out some serious cash for a killer suit – it better be one that will not only last (in quality) but will also be timeless and stay with the trends for many years to come. Hair should always look profession regardless of the length of your hair or the way you chose to style it. I think a low pony with a sidepart is acceptable as long as it is neat and tidy – same with long flowing hair or a short bob, both can fit the bill if they appear to be well kept.
I think there are two approaches to ladies suit attire. The first is to play up the slightly masculine ultra serious New Yorker look. I will call this the “New Yorker.” The New Yorker starts with a dark – usually black pant suit. This suit should boast a neatly tailored 1-3 button jacket with full-length sleeves and a straight leg pant, cuff and uncuffed pant legs are both acceptable. Now you may be thinking what I’m describing is a men’s suit – here’s where we get feminine. Heels are a must – preferably a 2 to 3 inch thin heel with a pointy toe. Accessories will playup the feminine quality in this look though accessories should be either black, silver, pearl or sparkly (but not too “bling!”) Hair should be neatly styled – not wild. My preference would be a low pony-tail or bun with a side part; the general idea is no lose hairs.
The second approach is more feminine, a little flirty, and allows for more color and accessories. The idea is to stick with a dark toned suit, but stay in the blacks, greys, maroons, navy blue color groups. Pants or skirts are acceptable, though skirts may not be shorter than two inches above the knee. Accessories can be pretty much any color so long as they fit into the color of the suit.
One could also brighten a dark suit by adding a flash of color underneath – I would recommend accessorizing the undershirt with jewelry, shoes, bag, etc.
When choosing accessories, be careful to not let the accessories overpower your attire – or yourself for that matter. Remember that the purpose of accessorizing is to compliment the entire look – think of it as a teamwork effort.
Makeup is also a big deal. Office makeup can be a little tricky. I have yet to meet anyone who looks fabulous in florescent lighting. Usually more blush is needed and pastels can help counteract the green hues glaring from the ceilings. All the while not looking like a drag queen. Beautiful for the club, but way too much for the office.
The first mistake a lot of freshy lawyers make is investing in a suit that is too trendy. If you’re going to shell out some serious cash for a killer suit – it better be one that will not only last (in quality) but will also be timeless and stay with the trends for many years to come. Hair should always look profession regardless of the length of your hair or the way you chose to style it. I think a low pony with a sidepart is acceptable as long as it is neat and tidy – same with long flowing hair or a short bob, both can fit the bill if they appear to be well kept.
I think there are two approaches to ladies suit attire. The first is to play up the slightly masculine ultra serious New Yorker look. I will call this the “New Yorker.” The New Yorker starts with a dark – usually black pant suit. This suit should boast a neatly tailored 1-3 button jacket with full-length sleeves and a straight leg pant, cuff and uncuffed pant legs are both acceptable. Now you may be thinking what I’m describing is a men’s suit – here’s where we get feminine. Heels are a must – preferably a 2 to 3 inch thin heel with a pointy toe. Accessories will playup the feminine quality in this look though accessories should be either black, silver, pearl or sparkly (but not too “bling!”) Hair should be neatly styled – not wild. My preference would be a low pony-tail or bun with a side part; the general idea is no lose hairs.
The second approach is more feminine, a little flirty, and allows for more color and accessories. The idea is to stick with a dark toned suit, but stay in the blacks, greys, maroons, navy blue color groups. Pants or skirts are acceptable, though skirts may not be shorter than two inches above the knee. Accessories can be pretty much any color so long as they fit into the color of the suit.
One could also brighten a dark suit by adding a flash of color underneath – I would recommend accessorizing the undershirt with jewelry, shoes, bag, etc.
When choosing accessories, be careful to not let the accessories overpower your attire – or yourself for that matter. Remember that the purpose of accessorizing is to compliment the entire look – think of it as a teamwork effort.
Makeup is also a big deal. Office makeup can be a little tricky. I have yet to meet anyone who looks fabulous in florescent lighting. Usually more blush is needed and pastels can help counteract the green hues glaring from the ceilings. All the while not looking like a drag queen. Beautiful for the club, but way too much for the office.
Friday, October 9, 2009
LawSchoolDreamer Makes Duplicate Blog on Wordpress
For my readers who prefer to use wordpress, A Paralegal’s Journey to Lawyerhood is now available on wordpress at:
http://mylawschooldreams.wordpress.com/
It will contain the exact same information and posts as the blogger.com blog (http://mylawschooldreams.blogspot.com/)
Thanks for your continued support!
http://mylawschooldreams.wordpress.com/
It will contain the exact same information and posts as the blogger.com blog (http://mylawschooldreams.blogspot.com/)
Thanks for your continued support!
Professional Appearances are of Paramount Importance
The attorney profession is unique in that a client or patron of an attorney does not necessarily receive a good or item in exchange for their payment, or leave the office with something physical to hold in their hands. What a client does leave with, however, is the sound legal advice of a competent attorney, certified by that state’s bar association that they are capable of handling legal issues. The legal profession is a service industry. What the client is paying for is the attorney’s knowledge. Rather, the attorney’s main selling point is knowledge. How does one sell knowledge? Or how does one advertise that they have knowledge? In today’s discriminatory world, knowledge is often conveyed by one’s professional appearance. Like it or not, all of us, regardless of age, race, sex, or geographical placement are judged by one thing in about 2 seconds: our appearance. One may not be able to change one’s DNA or genetics, but one can certainly make sure that one does everything they can to ensure a professional image.
One of the easiest things to change with regard to one’s appearance is their hairstyle. Men have it easy. There isn’t much to do to style a man’s hair. 10 minutes tops is all is needed. But the foundation of the style is the haircut. Long hair has never been accepted in any professional setting, nor is a short buzz cut considered business-like. There must be a happy medium. Below are two examples. Clearly one has a professional (yet edgy, trendy) hairstyle, and the other . . . well I’m not sure what to call it.
One of the easiest things to change with regard to one’s appearance is their hairstyle. Men have it easy. There isn’t much to do to style a man’s hair. 10 minutes tops is all is needed. But the foundation of the style is the haircut. Long hair has never been accepted in any professional setting, nor is a short buzz cut considered business-like. There must be a happy medium. Below are two examples. Clearly one has a professional (yet edgy, trendy) hairstyle, and the other . . . well I’m not sure what to call it.
Which would you trust with your legal matters?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)